One of the hotly debated issues these days is whether recorded music should be freely available for listening and download on the internet. The purpose of this webpage is to show the affects of Spotify on the music Throughout this site you will find arguments around if music should be free or not, . No one ever had to pay for recorded music—it was always "free" on the radio— and the home taping of LPs, the copying of cassettes, and, later. "An Eircom official told colleagues they should think of music piracy as 'sharing' and 'helping the health and good living of rich cocaine sniffing. Illustration for article titled Six Reasons Why Recorded Music Should Be Free. Grooveshark is getting it from all angles. Not only did its only. should the music industry allow free music to be downloaded without any restrictions with it. It can be any combination of those attributes, along with: * Emotionally challenging, * Intellectually challenging, * Psychologically challenging, * Spiritual * Primal. Before Spotify, people really never paid for music. Illegal downloads and streaming has always been and will always be a big part of the game. Yes, Music should be free. Music should be free because some people can not afford to buy and listen to it. If it is free on YouTube or the radio the why not make . It's been one of the biggest debates of the first decade of the 21st century: Is it ok to download music for free when you can buy it in other places.